Malaspina University-College's Writing- Across-the-Curriculum Project

Brenda Sully, April 1995

Table of Contents:

The Malaspina Project: Background

What Is Writing Across the Curriculum?

Writing to Learn/Learning to Write

Does WAC Work?

Strategies for Writing Assignments Across the Disciplines

Bibliography

April 1995

Malaspina University-College

by Brenda Sully

The Malaspina Project

The implementation of a Writing Across the Curriculum project has been a goal of faculty at Malaspina for several years now. Many instructors, recognizing that there are problems with student writing, have attempted over the years to integrate more writing in their classes. However, much of this work has been done in isolation, either of the instructor within his or her department, or of department initiatives within the institution. The Instructional Management Committee (IMC), recognizing that there was a need for a College-wide initiative, committed funds to a Writing Across the Curriculum project (totalling $28,200) in 1992. Because of setbacks, timing, and other problems, the project did not get off the ground until 1994 with the hiring of Margaret Macdonald from Adult Basic Education (ABE) and Brenda Sully from the English Department. Macdonald had to withdraw for workload reasons and a new hiring process added Rick Herding from ABE and Elizabeth Grove-White from the Journalism Department, whose interest is computer-assisted- writing. Lynn Hunter from Developmental Education and Liz Hammond-Kaareema from Instructional Computing rounded out the committee steering the project.

What Malaspina's Project Is All About

The cross-disciplinary committee which met and worked over the 1994-95 year decided very early on that its aims would be practical. Given the demands on instructors and the limited budget available, the committee decided on the following goals:

  1. To set up and maintain a Listserv of interested faculty and to disseminate information about WAC through E-mail
  2. To organize a Worldwide Web program listing thesaurus, dictionaries, documentation guides, sample student essays and assignments in various disciplines. Also included will be testimonials to the importance of writing in various disciplines
  3. A report including descriptions of sample exercises and assignments in a variety of disciplines. This report was to be handed out at the seminars and to be available in the library with a portfolio of original sources.
  4. Faculty seminars with guest lectures and practical workshops on Writing Across the Curriculum to be held in May 1995.

As well, WAC committee members attempted to visit each area of the College to elicit interest in the project and to solicit ideas. A workshop was held in November demonstrating the Computer Based Learning aspect of the process, Gopher and some grammatical tools. Brenda Sully also ran two seminars on Writing Across the Curriculum for the provincial meeting of college business faculties in May.

What is Writing Across the Curriculum?

Writing Across the Curriculum (hereafter referred to as WAC) is a phrase which gained currency in the late 1970's and early 1980's to describe attempts by various colleges and universities to broaden the scope of student writing beyond the confines of English departments. Usually, these programs were initiated by these English departments, but generally, all departments had input into, and control over the ways in which these programs were implemented. The beginnings of WAC are in Britain in the 1960's "language across the curriculum movement" and in the U.S. in the 1970's with a response "by some composition teachers to the media-induced perception of a new nation-wide literacy crisis" (Peritz, 2). It should be emphasized that WAC implies an INCREASE in student writing, not a decrease. Because of the large amount of research (in the United States, England and, to a lesser degree, Canada) completed in this area, our WAC initiative has the benefit of years of research into the programs, methods, and evaluation systems of previous attempts. WAC programs usually consist of faculty from various areas committing to the ideals of WAC theory and then attempting to incorporate writing assignments and/or journals in their classes.

Why WAC?

The first question that must be asked is: Why should instructors in disciplines that traditionally do not emphasize writing try to get their students to write more or to focus more on how they write?

First, there is a widespread awareness that communication skills are crucial in the workforce. If engineering is taken as an example, a survey of 52 U.S. engineering firms indicated that "writing proficiency is a major factor in deciding the promotion potential of an engineer"(Selfe qtd. in Selfe and Arbai 184). Keith Maxwell (who teaches accounting at the University of Puget Sound) assigns case studies regularly to his students and works with them on the clarity of their writing. He says his students are at a significant advantage when they compete for and retain jobs because they have had this experience (Cooke 10). We have all heard the assertion that our students will change jobs at least 3 or 4 times in their careers. Indeed, in Career, Vocational, or Education programs, instructors may be training students for a specific career but may be aware that in five years they may require or desire retraining for a related career or in a completely different field. Sometimes, in the case of Liberal Studies, Arts, or Sciences students, Malaspina isn't necessarily training for a specific job niche, but rather providing a general education which prepares the students for a variety of possibilities. In any case, students must have some of the following skills:

  1. the ability to solve problems
  2. the ability to examine ideas carefully and support them with evidence
  3. the ability to incorporate and synthesize information

As well, it is apparent that proficiency in language equals economic and social opportunities. As more and more of our students in career programs are taking courses which will "ladder" into further degrees, it is imperative they learn the skills which may be necessary later in their lives.

If we accept that students need more writing and more communications skills, then we must look at the problems which are apparent in their writing. Despite the above evidence, it is clear that students themselves do not necessarily perceive writing as critical to their success. When Michigan Tech decided to implement a WAC program in the late 1970's, they used workshops to elicit reposes from faculty in various disciplines. One of the things which became apparent immediately was that improving writing is not merely a case of learning to spell and learning correct grammar. Toby Fulwiler gives the following list as a typical example of the concerns that a cross-disciplinary workshop of professors came up with in terms of typical writing problems:

Typical Writing Problems

  1. Attitude (the motivation and interest of students)
  2. Mechanical Skills (spelling, punctuation)
  3. Organizational skills (how to piece it together)
  4. Style (conventions appropriate to task and audience)
  5. Reasoning ability (thinking, logic)
  6. Knowledge (something to write about)

Virginia Cooke of Fraser Valley College would add:

  1. Many students have no clear or realistic idea as to what is expected of them in college.
  2. Many students' language skills which relate to writing (reading, listening, vocabulary) are poor.
  3. Students seem to have trouble grasping questions and analysing problems.

(Cooke 7-9)

The purpose of our WAC program, then, must be to try to improve student's communication and analytical skills. It is not an easy task, as evidenced by the array of problems outlined above. Instructors and administrators must be committed and willing to change in order to make a WAC program work. There must also be an awareness that this is not a "once only" problem, that the writing skills of students will continue to be problematic at entry into post-secondary institutes. Because we are expanding the academy, we must be aware that the median writing skills of incoming students may go down. Instructors and administrators must also realize that, in the words of David Russell, there won't be a time when "students will again possess this elementary skill, this component of general education, and teachers can get on with their "real" work: teaching specific information" (165). Indeed, our "real work" must encompass the teaching of writing and of ways of thinking. Faculty and Administration will begin to understand that writing is not just a generalized mechanical skill learned once. Indeed, when they pass the responsibility for writing to others, subject teachers are, in effect, signalling to students that content is important, but process is not. What the WAC project hopes to do is to change this perception on the part of students and instructors and show that content and process are important.

Writing to Learn: Learning to Write

The array of writing and learning problems outlined above show the cornerstone of WAC thinking, which can be summed up as "writing is a process". Furthermore, most WAC researchers and experts emphasize that we must look at two sides of writing:

First, writing can help students to learn better. There is much research to support this view (cf. Emig, Elbow, McCrimmon). Art Young says language is a tool for learning (2). Barbara Walvoord writes "verbalization at the more conscious levels, including writing, probably helps the writer to understand the thoughts that otherwise would remain inaccessible. The research also suggests that "writing helps people to operate at a higher level of abstraction" (Walvoord and Smith qtd. in Cooke 5). This aspect of WAC, that writing is somehow integrally involved in our learning process, has its best application in those disciplines, such as physics and mathematics, where students need to think through and learn to evaluate problems. As Cooke states " when we ask our students to write .... [w]e are encouraging them to engage actively with the subject matter in our disciplines: to see patterns, connect ideas, make meanings - in other words, to learn" (6).

The second reason for emphasizing writing is the obvious one:
practising writing results in improved student writing. Cooke states "we should dispel the erroneous notion that one semester or even one year of a college-level composition course will correct the serious deficiencies in students' writing. If writing is to become a natural and effective skill for them, they must be offered practice and instruction in a great variety of academic settings. They must learn to write for different readers and in many contexts" (9). Many of the problems we see in students' writing result from them not having enough awareness of these different contexts, or from them not having enough practice addressing them.

WAC Implies Change

The Langara English department quotes College Composition and Communication 401 (Feb 1989):

The improvement of an individual student's writing requires persistent and frequent contact with the student both inside and outside the classroom. It requires assigning far more papers than are usually assigned in other college classrooms; it requires reading them and commenting on them not simply to justify a grade, but to offer guidance and suggestions for improvement; and it requires an atmosphere of trust. In short, it requires paying attention to the needs of individuals (64).

All of this implies a great deal of work on the part of instructors. Adding writing assignments, in particular to content driven courses, is difficult since students will often resist anything they perceive as not being directly related to course content. Given this, is it worth it to attempt?

WAC Programs: Do They Work?

In an ambitious follow-up to their WAC program, Michigan Tech devoted a great deal of time and energy to evaluating the addition of writing to various courses. Toby Fulwiler says the programs do work, citing evidence that the 4th year students who had experienced WAC courses felt more secure about their writing and actually wrote better (based on a variety of tests) than those who had no exposure to the program. Problems in evaluating such programs are huge. How does one know that simply attending four years of college didn't improve student writing? What about the differences between groups which were analyzed? It is very difficult to ensure scientific "control" groups in such situations. Is a 50 minute essay (one of the methods used by Selfe, Gorman, and Gorman, to evaluate students) a valid measure? Whatever we do at Malaspina, it would be helpful to try to monitor results in the classes of the various faculty who agree to implement some changes.

Some Central Issues

Judith Langer has pointed out that "the overwhelming focus of instruction in English, as well as History and Science, was on course content, on the object of study, to the neglect of ways to think about them" (70). What she has put her finger on is that quite often students are thrust into a situation in the classroom or with the essay assignment, where they do not know the rules of evidence or procedures for carrying discussion forward. In other words, they do not understand particular discourse conventions or the expectations of academic writing. In fact, many faculty struggle with the implications of an increasingly specialized and fragmented academy and the conflicting aims of a world which asks for a well trained generalized work force. David Russell has looked at the ways in which our academic world and writing have intersected. As he puts it "In the new, print-centered, compartmentalized secondary and higher education system, writing [is] no longer a single generalized skill learned once and for all at an early age; rather it [is] a complex and continuously developing response to specialized text-based discourse communities, highly embedded in the differentiated practises of those communities" (5). What we hope to do is to aid that idea of writing as a response. Judith Langer points out that "the overwhelming focus of instruction in English, as well as History and Science, [is] on course content, on the object of study-the facts, to the neglect of ways to think about them" (Langer qtd. in Herrington 69).

What Malaspina's Project Is All About

The cross-disciplinary committee which met and worked over the 1994-95 year decided very early on that its aims would be practical. Given the demands on instructors and the limited budget available, the committee decided on the following goals:

  1. To set up and maintain a Listserv of interested faculty and to disseminate information about WAC through E-mail
  2. To organize a Worldwide Web program listing thesaurus, dictionaries, documentation guides, sample student essays and assignments in various disciplines. Also included will be testimonials to the importance of writing in various disciplines
  3. A report including descriptions of sample exercises and assignments in a variety of disciplines. This report was to be handed out at the seminars and to be available in the library with a portfolio of original sources.
  4. Faculty seminars with guest lectures and practical workshops on Writing Across the Curriculum to be held in May 1995.

As well, WAC committee members attempted to visit each area of the College to elicit interest in the project and to solicit ideas. A workshop was held in November demonstrating the Computer Based Learning aspect of the process, Gopher and some grammatical tools. Brenda Sully also ran two seminars on Writing Across the Curriculum for the provincial meeting of college business faculties in May.

How to Design Assignments -

General Principles

Barbara Walvoord and others have analyzed fifteen major assignments in 4 disciplines and realized that twelve of these assignments:

asked students for evaluation and/or problem solving in the form of good/better/best questions:

Good: Is X good or bad?

Better: Which is better X or Y?

Best: Which is the best among available options?
What is the best solution to a given problem?

(Walvoord et al. 7)

These require complex thinking not memorization, and it is this complexity which instructors should aim for in their writing assignments. Walvoord says that students are expected to "function competently in the role of 'professional-in-training" (8).

This role means

(Walvoord et al. 9)

Difficulties

In the studies, difficulties arose in 6 areas of student's thinking and writing processes:

  1. Gathering sufficient specific information
  2. In the paper, constructing the audience and the self
  3. Stating a position
  4. Using appropriate discipline-based methods to arrive at the position and to support it with evidence.
  5. Managing complexity (i.e. avoiding what the teacher considered various aspects of an issue; discussing alternative solutions to problems; acknowledging and answering counter arguments and counter evidence; in science, designing an experiment with appropriate operational definitions and control of variables)
  6. Organizing the paper.

(Walvoord et al. 14)

How to address these difficulties

Derek Soles of Camosun College has shown that students' understanding of assignments and writing improves if students understand the assignment and have some input into the criteria. Therefore:

  1. Be clear about the types of sources you expect. Explain differences between primary and secondary sources. What is acceptable? Annotated bibliographies are often a good way of familiarizing students with the different types of writing.
  2. Explain who the audience is for the paper? What assumptions can the student make? Is the speaker of the work the powerful voice of authority-rational and careful-or the subjective voice? Which is appropriate and why?
  3. Use the idea of drafting and outlining of thesis or hypothesis. Allowing students to use steps can be helpful. Explain the idea of a working hypothesis.
  4. Explain the conventions of the discipline - APA, for example, has recently changed - what is appropriate? Why do historians use footnotes?
  5. Criteria - Possibly set these up before the assignment. Also, students can hand in the grade they expected to get for the first assignment based on this criteria and you the instructor can see what needs to be more clearly explained.
  6. Some methods of clarifying what you expect to see in a good response to the assignment. Provide examples of both effective and unsatisfactory responses to similar questions. You can show these assignments on overheads or hand them out and ask students to grade them according to your criteria. Sometimes, providing a sample of your work is a good idea.
  7. Do the assignment yourself can help you to catch problems with the assignment.

Virginia Cooke also provides some information on how to design assignments that work:

In order to be effective, a writing assignment should satisfy the following criteria:

(Cooke 25)

Her suggestions:

  1. Always give the assignments in writing
  2. If possible, assign several short pieces of writing rather than on long one
  3. Try writing the assignments yourself; they can fool you
  4. Consider the objectives of the course when you plan and design your assignment s to meet those objectives
  5. Sequence your writing assignments, beginning, if possible, with something students know how to do, and building on the previous writing assignments
  6. If possible, allow students to revise their essays, or to submit drafts either for peer or instructor comments.
  7. Share your assignments with colleagues for comment and revision.

(Cooke 25-30)

Cooke's suggestions for grading:

  1. Skim - you'll understand context and avoid asking questions which are later clarified.
  2. Don't edit - Make one paragraph (or page or two pages) for spelling grammar etc. - note that the rest needs it - Students tend to think this is all I need to do.
  3. Make certain that the most important points don't get lost.
  4. Strengths and weaknesses
  5. Ask questions - Show why you as a reader are confused.

(Cooke 43-49)

All in all, take what you can from this section. Try some elements, look at the assignments which follow and see which might be helpful to you.

Examples of Assignments

The section following lists a series of assignments and sources for various disciplines. These sources can be found in the portfolio entitled "Writing Across the Curriculum" in the library or in various texts also to be found in the library. This is not meant to be an exhaustive list nor should readers feel compelled to stay in their own disciplines. Browsing through suggested assignments in other disciplines is encouraged. Where more than one assignment is described per discipline they are lettered. A, B, and C.

Art History

Barbara Filo, a Professor of Art History at Whitworth College, describes an assignment where her students are expected to review art exhibits. The assignment is notable for her detailed use of criteria to help students understand what it is critics need to look at in order to critique art intelligently (Whitworth College 54-8).

Biology

A) For a detailed description of peer critiquing and analysis of models in Biology laboratory reports see Elizabeth A. Flynn, George A. McCulley, and Ronald K. Gratz. "Writing in Biology" in Writing Across the Disciplines, Art Young and Toby Fulwiler Eds. The methodology used was as follows:

  1. A sample biology article was passed out to students who then read it, took notes, and discussed the function of each of its parts.
  2. The instructor then passed out a copy of the article specifying the sections of the piece and a description of the function of those sections in terms of the scientific method.
  3. Students then analyzed 3 more articles in small groups.
  4. Later, in a specific laboratory experiment, students were allowed class time for peer critiquing of their lab reports (162-163).

B) Lee Anne Chaney, Professor of Biology at Whitworth College, describes a detailed assignment for writing an abstract. She also outlines how students are allowed to rewrite the abstracts (Whitworth College 69-75). The description of the assignment is useful chiefly in terms of the explanations of conventions she provides on pages 74-75.

C) Virginia Johnson Anderson at Towson State University describes her methods of having students conduct and report on original scientific research in a second-year Biological Literature class. The article, one of many described by Barbara Walvoord, takes the reader through Anderson's teaching methods and how she changes them to improve student performance over several years. Described are specific assignments used in the classroom which include:

The article provides detailed analysis of Anderson's methodology, of her teaching methods and of data collection and the reactions and progress of two classes. The article is one of the best at showing how students perceive (and misperceive) the role of the scientist as writer. An excellent source for anyone attempting to teach biological report writing and the conventions of the scientific method (Walvoord et al. 177-227).

General Interest

Bonnie B. Spanier of the State University of New York provides an interesting look at the "discourse community" of the Biological Sciences. She posits that "writing-across-the-curriculum projects that address ideology in the discourse and practise of science [emphasis hers] are potentially transformative and may help to alleviate the exclusion of women and people of color in scientific literacy in the United States, and the vast gulf between scientific experts and the public in issues of science and society" (Spanier in Herrington and Moran 193-212).

Business

A) George Weber, Professor of Economics at Whitworth College, describes a research/analysis position paper and an analysis of guests' presentations in class. Weber uses a step by step method for having students research and draft papers, incorporating conferences with students. (Whitworth College, p. 48) The description doesn't provide a great deal of detail but it is worth reading for Weber's change in emphasis between the two methods (Whitworth College 43-48).

B) Dean Drenk, a Finance Professor at an American university, uses process oriented writing in a finance class. He uses multiple trials (which many would call drafts), a detailed grading format, and a series of discussions or meetings with the students. The article is interesting for his description of his reasons for using written assignments in a finance course and his exploration of the process (Drenk in Griffin 53-58).

C) Andrew Moss and Carol Holder provide a format for generating effective writing assignments which will prepare students for the kind of collaborative writing they may face in the business world. An example of this method follows:

Assume that you and a partner have an accounting firm. You have just accepted a new client, Gordon Blue, who has provided the following information during several conferences.

Blue is 58 years old and has a wife and three grown children. He has been the maitre d' at a prominent restaurant for twenty years and is now opening his own place.

Blue has posed several questions he wants you and your partner to answer:

1) What form of business expertise should be set up for his new restaurant? ...

2) Should he lease or buy the equipment? ...

3) What kind of retirement plans are available for self-employed persons? ...

4) Can and should he sell his name to raise capital needed in the business? ...

5) Can he take a Nile cruise and claim some portion of the costs as business expenses as he plans to attend professional seminars en route? ...

6) How can he give some of his wealth to his children effective at his death without creating for them a heavy tax liability?

7) How might he best take advantage of income averaging provisions of Federal tax law...

8) What does internal control of a business mean?

(Inside English 15)

Students are paired and told that the pairs must draft responses to any four of these questions and that their answers must be in clear non-technical language.

Also, students are grouped into larger teams which work on an oral response to one of the questions. During this presentation the teacher and class act as "Gordon Blue" asking questions. Then, there is drafting of final responses, criticism of the drafts on overheads, and final writing and grading of the finished product.

The original article contains much more detail. (Inside English 15)

D) A. Kimbough Sherman of Loyala College in Maryland describes his use of WAC principles and assignments in his production management course "which deals with the operational aspects of a business, such as what goods and services it provides, where it locates, and how it organizes resources, people, and processes. (50) (This chapter provides a detailed examination of expectations and methodology in a course.) Sherman tries to set up situations where students have to confront complex business situations and make decisions. He describes three assignments:

  1. An analytical assignment of one page where students make a decision about locating a new business.
  2. An analytical assignment where students evaluate layout and work designs of two restaurants. (1 page)
  3. A term paper about raising productivity in the U.S. (8 pages draft, 5 pages final) (52)

Sherman's experiences are interesting in particular because of the way students interpret (or misinterpret) assignment sheets, for example, in not using library resources unless explicitly told to do so. There is also a good discussion of the problems raised in insufficiently-controlled peer discussions and also of the importance of pre-draft writing (Walvoord et al. 50-96).

E) Chris Thaiss describes how a Professor of Business Administration, George Cole, at the College of William and Mary, "combines interviews and written reports to enhance the writing, speaking, and listening abilities of his students" (Thaiss in Griffin 51). Cole uses videotape to simulate situations such as job interviews which the students then analyze in writing. Thaiss also describes Barbara Belling's (of James Madison University) assignment of three, six, and twelve page case reports. She writes her own cases in order to ascertain that they are "do-able" and provides opportunities for feedback and revision (Thaiss in Griffin 51-52).

Chemistry

Donald F. Calbreath, Professor of Chemistry at Whitworth College, describes three assignments for a fourth-year course: an abstract, a comparison of methods, and a research paper. Calbreath provides the assignment sheets used in the first two of these assignments. (Whitworth College, 65-67) This description is a bit sketchy but worthwhile because of his criteria.

Economics

Brian Coulter at U F VC provides an outline for a term paper assignment in Economics (first year). He explains what a term paper is, how to do proper research, how to write a paper (he provides an outline or template for a typical paper); he also details what plagiarism is and provides a list of standard sources for each topic (Cooke 81- 87).

Education

Math & Science

A) Judy Westerburg and Jack Whiting describe a project for a high school class (grade unspecified) combining a general mathematics class (i.e. non-matriculation) and a science class.

The project requires two 50 minute periods. Students are divided into groups to compare different brands of popcorn in terms of ratio of popped and unpopped kernels, weight and volume, size, colour, flavour, and texture. Then, the class compiles the information for averaging. Finally each student creates a magazine advertisement based on the brand they think is best. The advertisement must include a narrative giving at least four reasons (from the data) that their brand is the best. (Westerburg 9 and Whiting 306-08)

B) Diane Miller describes using writing prompts in high school mathematics classes. As students are beginning class, Diane Miller has them respond in writing to various "prompts." Students are given five minutes to write down their responses to set problems. The responses can be read quickly and teachers can respond in writing or, if time is a problem, verbally. They are not graded for content, spelling, or grammar.

Examples of prompts include:

General Mathematics. You have studied the commutative property for addition and multiplication of real numbers. Not all operators are commutative. If you were asked to explain to a friend why division is not commutative, what would you say?

Algebra. Suppose a friend asks you to check the answers to some homework problems. Would you mark the following problem correct or incorrect. Explain why....(a + b)² = a² + b²

Geometry. Suppose your younger sister or brother was working some problems that applied the Pythagorean theorem, that is, a² + b² = c². After working a few problems (s)he asked you, "How do we know that the sum of the squares of the legs of a right triangle equals the square of the hypotenuse?" What would you say?

(Miller 130)

Other

C) Carol Hellar, Professor of Education at Whitworth College, writes about an Educational Foundations course: Modern American Education. She asks students to design an "ideal school". Students are allowed to pick an elementary, middle, or secondary school (the gradations used in Washington State). She gives clear, detailed questions which must be addressed. Students have to provide plans and present their vision to the class in a 12 page presentation. They must also hand in a 6 page (minimum) paper describing the school, its operations and philosophies. A good detailed description of an assignment (Whitworth College 62-64).

English

A) Elizabeth A. Flynn describes a method of using responses to literature as a stepping stone to more detailed writing. She draws on James Britton and Linda Flower to show how students move from expressive writing to essays. The steps are as follows:

  1. Journal responses to the story A & P by John Updike as an example.
  2. Drafting of an essay focussing on characterization.
  3. Peer review in class.
  4. Revised draft handed in for grading.

(Young and Fulwiler 208-214)

B) Susan Peck MacDonald and Charles R. Cooper, both at the University of California, San Diego, describe using writing in a Chinese literature course where students had already taken freshman composition. The instructors designed and oversaw a controlled experiment in different sections assigning academic journals in some sections and dialogic journals in other sections. Results clearly show that academic writing (i.e. writing that clearly answers set questions or explains aspects of the texts) seems to benefit students more than dialogic (expressive writing). However, both types of writing specifically improve student's results over those students who did no journal writing. An excellent article, one of the few in the area which attempts to use scientific method to evaluate writing assignments (MacDonald and Cooper in Herrington and Moran 137-155).

C) Toby Fulwiler describes an American literature course where the assignments use Britton's expressive, transactional, and poetic modes of writing. Fulwiler uses the following methods to encourage and assess his students' writing:

  1. Dialogue journal - 20% of grade. Students must hand in selected excerpts three times during the semester.
  2. Essays - three 2 page - 40% of grade - the essays are as follows:
    a) A critical essay
    b) An essay reflecting personal experience with readings in the course
    c) An imaginative essay
  3. Literature discussion group - 20%
  4. Final examination - written collaboratively by the group (20% of grade).

(Fulwiler in Herrington and Moran157-158)

Fulwiler provides details from the students' journals and examples of the kinds of questions he poses to them. He also provides guidelines for the group work. (Fulwiler in Herrington and Moran156-173).

D) A suggestion from Helen Heightsman Gordon of Bakersfield College is to have students copy short well-written compositions "changing each one in some meaningful way, such as from present to past, singular to plural, slang to standard English, and so on. Or they may combine selected sentences within the composition to term appositives, compound sentences, adjective clauses, adverbial clauses, etc. They learn the appropriate punctuation in context as they make these changes. In effect, they are 'playing the game as they learn the rules-learning by doing'" (Inside English 11).

E) Virginia Cooke provides a detailed assignment for a first-year English class. She provides examples from various plays, a step-by-step method of looking at the literature and doing research and information about such conventions as speaking in the present tense, quoting correctly, etc. (Cooke 76-80).

General Interest

In "Shallow Roots or Taproots for Writing Across the Curriculum" Edward M. White provides an excellent discussion as to how WAC programs, despite an initial surge of interest, have remained "Shallow" in many post-secondary institutions. His article concentrates on support for English faculty (i.e. training for lower- and upper-level writing courses) and for programs which have instituted upper-level writing courses that are program specific at California State University. Also, he describes how the Writing Centre at California State keeps copies of syllabi, sample texts, and successful writing assignments.

Geography

General Interest

Louise Dunlap writes an excellent overview of some of the issues facing those who teach writing to graduate students in urban and regional planning. It should be noted that this article has implications for economists, statisticians, sociologists, geographers, engineers, and historians, among others. She looks at particular types of writing: critical writing, neutral writing, fast writing. A fascinating analysis of the politics involved in this mode of discourse (Dunlap in Herrington and Moran 213-230).

History

A) Jim Hunt, Professor of History at Whitworth College, describes an evaluation sheet he uses for grading history papers and a brief description of writing a short essay (Whitworth College 76-79) & (Fulwiler192-207).

B) John R. Breihan, Professor of History at Loyola College, uses WAC principles in a first-year Modern Civilization course. Walvoord and Breihan evaluate how his teaching methods help or hinder students' understanding of historical principles and writing. Specific teaching methods include:

  1. An issue-oriented course plan, using issues as points of entry into the course.
  2. Three major argumentative essays about those issues; these essays formed the central assignments towards which much of the other course activities were pointed.
  3. A checksheet for evaluating/grading the essays that made [Breihan's] expectations very explicit.
  4. Daily, focused writings ("exercises") explicitly planned both to develop needed skills and information and to serve as pre-draft preparation for the essays.
  5. In-class discussions in which Breihan led his students through the modes of argument he wanted them to learn.
  6. Seven in-class debates on historical issues that also served as pre-draft preparation for the essays.
  7. Responses by Breihan on drafts of the essays, after which students revised (Walvoord et al. 98).

The article is interesting for methods Breihan used in encouraging students to formulate theses and provides a clear evaluation sheet (109). It is also good for his description of the use of argument and counter argument. Breihan and Walvoord also include questions on single readings and provide methods of guiding students through stages of debates and choosing positions and defending them. This chapter is not easily summarized and is best read in its entirety (Walvoord et al. 97-143).

C) Chris Thaiss outlines how historian Donald Holsinger of George Mason uses journal writing and in-class writing in an African history course. Holsinger provides an example of how he gives students two accounts of Stanley's encounter with hostile "natives". Students are asked to pose as newspaper columnists who must write using the two sources (Thaisss in Griffin 50-51).

D) Bill Breitenback at the University of Puget Sound describes assignments for a third-year history course in American Transcendentalism. This section of Cooke's work is interesting for the way it leads students through a series of assignments and editing and conferencing steps, building on the knowledge gained through the previous assignment (Cooke 88-95).

Mathematics

Note: Please look under "education" for other ideas for assignments. Although that section deals with primary and secondary students there may be some crossover possible as many of the assignments in that section deal with mathematics classes.

A) Arlo W. Schurle at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in Indiana assigns ten one or two page essays in "which they [students explained] some standard Calculus II topic." At the beginning of the year he provides a sample assignment and student response so students would have a model. Schurle also provides results from a questionnaire which shows that students do value writing as a tool for learning mathematics. Unfortunately Schurle doesn't give criteria for grading, although he says he does mark for mathematical correctness and completeness, grammar, spelling and style:

  1. Explain what a differential equation is and what a solution of a differential equation is. Give an example.
  2. Explain what a separable differential equation is and how to solve such an equation. What might prevent you from getting a solution in the form y=f(x)?
  3. Explain what a first order linear differential equation is and how to solve such an equation. Also, use an example to explain this process to your friend in another MA 201 section.
  4. Explain what an nth order linear differential equation is and what a general solution of such an equation looks like. Give an example.
  5. Explain how to solve an nth order constant coefficient homogeneous linear differential equation. Include all possible cases and how to deal with each of them.
  6. Explain how to find the general solution of an arbitrary nonhomogeneous linear differential equation. Then explain the method of undetermined coefficients.
  7. Explain when you must use the method of variation of parameters. Also, use an example to explain this method to your fellow MA 201 student.
  8. Explain what the Laplace transform of a function is and why the Laplace transform is so useful for solving differential equations. Also give and example with accompanying explanation.
  9. Explain the method of partial fractions and how it applied to the use of the Laplace transform.

(Schurle 134-135)

B) Barbara King at Rutgers University describes using James Britton's theories on expressive and transactional writing. She outlines six ways of getting students to use transactional writing (writing to explain, report, or persuade):

  1. Summaries - She asks students to summarize the previous day's material or summarize at the end of class. These can be reviewed by the instructor or used by the students as study notes.
  2. Questions - Students formulate and write down questions they have about problems. The questions can be collected by the instructor and used as a review of homework. Or, they may be discussed in groups.
  3. Explanations of mathematical concepts - Again, these can be handed in or discussed in groups.
  4. Definitions of concepts in the student's own words.
  5. Reports - Topics can include "the life of a famous mathematician, research on math anxiety, new developments in computer technology, and careers in mathematics"
  6. Word problems.

(King in Griffin 42)

King also describes using Journals and Free Writing to explore feelings about mathematical problems (King in Griffin 39-44).

C) Catherine Gorini provides the following essay assignment: "A mathematician, like a painter or a poet, is a maker of patterns. If his patterns are more permanent than theirs, it is because they are made with ideas" (G.H. Hardy qtd in Gorini 246). She prefers having students go through a detailed set of steps - outline/drafting - (5% of grade), feedback from instructors, or peer conferencing. She points out that instructor's comments should note what is good as well as correct mistakes in logic and grammar (Gorini 247).

General Interest

For an excellent discussion of the uses and efficacy of journal writing in mathematics classes see Selfe, Peterson and Nahrging's "Journal Writing in Mathematics" in Writing Across the Disciplines (Young & Fulwiler 192-207). The authors discuss a research project involving mathematics students who were involved in journal writing. they summarize the results of their research (much of which points to how difficult it is to measure the value of such tools) and point the way to future research.

Music

Richard Evans, Professor of Music at Whitworth College, describes a detailed, written assignment for music students which, because it involves detailed writing and clear research steps andinvolves listening to a piece of music at least six times, helps students to appreciate fully modern (Twentieth Century) music-an area where students are reluctant to understand what the composers had perhaps intended (Whitworth College 49-55).

Nursing

Chris Thaiss describes how Moira Shine, a Nursing Professor at George Mason, has her upper-level and graduate nursing students go through a process whereby students write a letter which describes the point of a potential article, "the kinds of data that will support it, the writer's qualifications and the ways in which the audience can use the information" (44). Students then must work with other students who act as editors, asking questions and suggesting ideas for developing the topic. Because her students are at a high level, some of the articles which result from this process have actually been published (Thaiss in Griffin 49).

Physics

John C. Bean, Dean Drenk, and F.D. Lee describe using short writing assignments called "microthemes" in physics classes. They emphasize that the assignments don't add a heavy grading load on the instructor. Microthemes are essays so short they can be typed on one 5 X 8 note card. One type of microtheme is described where students summarize an article in 1 - 200 words. The authors provide detailed criteria for grading in the article. The article also contains some other types of microthemes which might have more relevance to Finance and Philosophy (Bean et al. in Griffin 34-37).

Political Science

A clear description by John Yoder , Professor of Political Science at Whitworth College, of a step-by-step method he uses to get students to write better researched, better organized research papers. He has students follow eight steps:

1) Background reading

2) A key question

3) A web of ideas

4) An annotated bibliography

5) Notes on reading and research

6) An outline

7) A rough draft

8) A final draft

Each step is handed in to the instructor for grading. Yoder points out that the detailed comments he has provided along the way free him from making detailed notes on the final paper (Whitworth College 37-44).

Psychology

A) Michael E. Gorman, Margaret Gorman and Art Young describe a process by which creative writing was introduced into an introductory psychology class. The authors draw heavily on James Britton's theoretical base. The assignments are structured as follows:

1) Students were asked to write a poem about schizophrenia before they had read anything about it, to give them a chance to explore their feelings and impressions. They were told this poem would not be graded...

2) The students were then assigned a draft essay, worth 4 points (out of a total of 100 for the course), in which they had to discuss how the bio-medical and learning models, two of the perspectives on schizophrenia in the course, could be applied to Maili's cases [Mark Vonnegut's The Eden Express, an account of schizophrenia which students had been asked to read]. They were told this essay would help them with their final papers and that it would not be graded critically.

3) Next, students had to write a draft short story on roughly the same topic as their draft essay. The idea here was to compare transactional and poetic approaches to the same assignment. The story was also worth 4 points and again, students knew it would not be graded critically.

4) Toward the end of the course, students were asked to write a poem about how the humanistic-existential perspective could be applied to Mark's case, the same assignments as had been used in a previous class. This poem was expected to be closer to a final product...and was worth two points... .

5) At the end of the course, the students had to hand in a formal paper in which they compared the bio-medical and humanistic-existential approaches to Mark's schizophrenia. This paper was worth ten points and students knew it would be graded more critically than their first draft.

6) Students were asked to keep journals throughout the quarter, making two entries a week...We intended to use the journal to help us gauge student's reactions to the assignments-particularly the case-study students. But the focus of our study was on the contrast between transactional and poetic writing; therefore, we did not attempt a detailed study of the impact of the journals (Gorman, Gorman, and Young in Writing Across the Disciplines 139-141).

The article includes details from three student's work and comments on how students felt about the process.

(Gorman, Gorman, and Young in

Writing Across the Disciplines 139-160)

B) Barbara Walvoord and Susan Miller Robison, a psychology instructor at the College of Notre Dame of Maryland, describe Robison's attempts to use WAC principles in a first-year Human Sexuality class. Students were expected to learn about research methodology as well as content. An interesting chapter worthwhile for its detailed criteria used on assignment sheets (151). Should be noted that the College is all-female and the instructor is teaching "somewhat" from a Catholic perspective (Walvoord et al. 44-176).

C) Chris Thaiss describes how psychologist Roy Smith of Mary Washington College teaches lab reporting by comparing lab reports to expository essays in terms of thesis and hypothesis, evidence and data, and conclusions. He also accepts revisions of reports (Thaiss in Griffin 49).

D) Astrid Ster at the University College of the Fraser Valley describes two developmental research projects for a Psychology class (second year). She provides detailed plans and questions for students to answer as they are setting up their studies. She also provides a research option for students who want to get a B or below which is less detailed. Good for explaining the many steps involved in designing and conducting a research study (Cooke 97-103).

Sociology

A) Robert A. Clark, Professor of Sociology at South Mountain Community College, describes in detail an assignment on sociology of the family where students have to write a six to eight page paper pursuing a sociological question about some aspect of family life. Clarke uses many elements familiar to those who have written successful research assignments: he has clear guidelines, good examples of questions, and clear criteria. Students have to do detailed preliminary research and then come to class with their topic and ten questions they want answered about this topic. Working in groups, the students have to narrow this list down to one sociological question. Then, drafting and instructor- student-conferences follow. An excellent article on the instructor's changing attitudes towards writing in the sociology classroom. The professor also lists sample topics and describes another type of writing-the reactive paper on a text (Whitworth 28-36).

B) Jean Ballard-Kent provides a detailed assignment on article review. The article is excellent for its detailed information and its step-by-step bringing of the student through the process (Cooke 69-75).

Visual Arts

Chris Thaiss describes how architecture professor Joseph Wong of Virginia Tech uses WAC principles in writing assignments. This description is interesting for instructors at Malaspina primarily for its applications for design assignments. First students write a short essay on their "experiences and professional goals" (Thaiss in Griffin 50). Then, students must describe in words a chosen piece of design and "two other students [must] produce a graphic reconstruction of the design from the verbal description" (Thaiss in Griffin 50).

WORKS CITED

Adams, Barbara et al. "Writing for Learning: How to Achieve a Total College Commitment." April, 1985, ED 258 666.

Ammon, Paul and Mary Sue Ammes. "Using Student Writing to Assess and Promote Understanding in Science." 1990, ED 316864.

Bertch, Julie. "Writing for Learning: Starting a Writing Across the Curriculum Program in the Community College." April, 1985.

Bilson, Barbara, Ed. Inside English: Journal of the English Council of California Two-Year Colleges. Vol. VIII, Nos. 1-4, September, 1981, December, 1981, March 1982, and June 1982.

Broglie, Mary and Tom Hare. "Aspects and Writing Across the Curriculum: Coming Together to Examine Shattering Paradigms." The Writing Notebook. Vol. 9 (4), April-May, 1992, 19-39.

Carson, Jay. "Recognizing and Using Context as a Survival Tool for WAC." March, 1992, ED 346497.

Cooke, Virginia. Writing Across the Curriculum: A Faculty Handbook . Victoria. Centre for Curriculum and Professional Development, 1991.

D'Hollander, Ruth; Black, John; Coupe, Rosemary; Wright, Dennis. Meeting New Challenges Across the Curriculum: A Report on Teaching, Reading, Critical Thinking, and Writing in All Subject Areas. Victoria: The Centre for Curriculum and Professional Development, 1988.

Gorini, Catherine A. "An Integrated Program of Writing and Speaking in the Undergraduate Mathematics Curriculum." Primus , Vol. 1, No. 3, September, 1991, 244-252.

Greene, Brenda M., Leon P. Johnson, William C. Harris and John M. Flowers. "Revitalizing Writing Across the Curriculum: Writing in the Sciences". Community Review. V.II, No. 1-2, 1990-91.

Griffin, C. Williams, Ed., Teaching Writing in All Disciplines . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc. Publishers, 1982.

Hedley, Jane; Parker, Jo Ellen. "Writing Across the Curriculum: The Vantage of the Liberal Arts." ADE Bulletin. Spring, 1991, 22-28.

Herrington, Anne and Charles Moran. Eds. Writing, Teaching, and Learning in the Disciplines. New York: The Modern Language Association of America, 1992.

Kuriloff, Peshe C. "Writing Across the Curriculum and the Future of Freshman English: A Dialogue Between Literature and Composition." ADE Bulletin. Spring, 1991. 34-39.

McLeod, Susan H. (Ed.) Strengthening Programs for Writing Across the Curriculum. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc. Publishers, 1988.

Miller, Diane L. "Begin Mathematics Class with Writing." The Mathematics Teacher. Vol. 85, June, 1991, 129-36.

Peritz, Janice H. "When Learning is Not Enough: Writing Across the Curriculum and the (RE)turn to Rhetoric." Internet JAC 14.2, Fall 1994.

Ronald, Kate. "On the Outside Looking In: Student's Analyses of Professional Discourse Communities." Rhetoric Review Fall, 1988, v.7 (1), 130-149.

Russell, David R. Writing in the Academic Disciplines 1870-1990: A Curricular History. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1991.

Spencer, Ernest. Writing Matters Across the Curriculum. Edinburgh: Hodder and Stoughton for the Scottish Council for Research in Education, 1983.

Walvoord, Barbara E., MacCarthy, Lucille P. Thinking and Writing in College: A Naturalistic Study of Students in Four Disciplines . National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, Illinois. Eric Ed 324591

Weiser, Michael S. "Building on Common Ground: Overcoming Resistance to WAC in the Technical College." March 1992, ED 346493.

Westburg, Judy and Jack Whiting. "Popcorn: An Explosive Mixture of General Mathematics and General Science." Mathematics Teacher. April, 1992, Vol. 85, Issue 4, 306-08.

White, Edward M. "Shallow Roots or Taproots for Writing Across the Curriculum." ADE Bulletin. Spring, 1991, 29-33.

Whitney, Bob. "New Developments in the Teaching of Writing: A Workshop." Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines . Sept./Oct. 1993, 32-36.

Whitworth College. Writing Across the Curriculum. Spokane: Consortium for the Advancement of Private Higher Education, 1992.

Young, Art and Toby Fulwiler. Writing Across the Disciplines: Research Into Practice. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook Publishers, 1986.